It wasn't until recently that I stumbled upon Julian Dibbell's article from New York magazine about the Calorie Restriction diet (a lifestyle that Dibbell describes as "a lifetime lived as close to the brink of starvation as your body can stand"). I came away from the article more than a little agitated about this practice and its proponents. In the course of doing some research, I didn't have to stray too far to find Katherine Stevens's Rudd Sound Bites blog entry on this topic from October of last year. In it, Stevens touches on most of the issues that stuck out to me as well. Beneath Stevens's post, in the comments section, was a lengthy, stern, yet exceedingly polite refutation of many of Stevens's points by someone identifying herself as April Smith, one of the "CR" adherents who was profiled in the New York article. Smith took Stevens's post apart point by point, extracting phrases and rebutting them with the precision and detail of one well-heeled in defending her lifestyle. And so it is with some trepidation that I set out now to offer my own reflection on one particular point in the Calorie Restriction philosophy.
Dibbell's description of a CR practitioner who eats exactly 1913 calories per day was the detail of the article that leaped out at me, grabbed hold, and wouldn't let go. That the number was so specific struck me as absurd, and almost comical. That the number was apparently an inflexible standard struck me as unhealthy.
I wondered, How precisely had this individual arrived at that number? Was it an exact calculation of the lowest possible number of calories that would be required to sustain his vital bodily functions at an optimal level? Was it even possible to make such a calculation? Can you accurately calculate the caloric value of food down to a single calorie? The logistics of the whole thing intrigued me. But the question that nagged me was this one: What was psychology behind such a strict adherence to a nutritional standard?
My own (avowedly unscientific) diagnosis was that Calorie Restriction is a medically justifiable eating disorder. People who practice CR seem to display some of the same behaviors as anorexics (the ritualization of meals, the perfectionism), yet have at their disposal a host of scientific evidence to prove that their bodies are as healthy as they could possibly be. What psychological, behavioral, or sociological sacrifices do CR people have to make to attain a physical ideal?
April Smith defends herself from the Stevens's accusation of having a "hyper-obsession with control" by saying that she and others who practice CR are merely trying to slow down their biological aging process. That sounds precisely like an obsession with control to me. In her comment, Smith compares CR people with bakers who are meticulous about measuring the ingredients they put into their baked goods, saying that no one calls a cook pathological when she demands accuracy in her recipes. At this point, the discussion becomes about ideals. Maybe there is an ideal of a cake, a cookie, and even a human body. But is the desire to create a "perfect" baked good (and the thought processes that underly it) equivalent to the desire to attain a "perfect" body? This casual observer would say no.
It's actually kind of surprising that as many of the women were actually eating a diet that was low in carbohydrate. 9% of the women were eating a diet where less than 30% of calories came from carbohydrate.
Posted by: Cheap Viagra | November 12, 2009 at 04:14 PM
Wanna to share with you some of <a href=http://celebritymovieblog.com/index.html>celeb movies</a> from my home site. Just look what <a href=http://celebritymovieblog.com/celebrities/Paris-Hilton.html>Paris Hilton</a> do when night comes! :)
Posted by: celebsfan | April 08, 2009 at 06:45 PM
Good day to all, great site here :) I am looking for fans of celebs. If you have any fresh paparazzi pictures with someone, i will appreciate your help :) <br><br> In exchange I can upload some top hottest stuff from my hd here. <br> Regards! Waiting for links with good stuff, and free of course :)
Posted by: Mariella | April 01, 2009 at 09:56 PM
hi! The babes are here! This is my best site to visit. I make sure I am alone in case I get too hot. Post your favorite link here.
Posted by: Noble | April 01, 2009 at 02:43 AM
Good post, but have you thought about The Calorie Restriction Diet before?
Posted by: Julie Smith | March 26, 2009 at 07:20 AM